The Untold History of Sulu, Burkina Faso: A Microcosm of Global Struggles
Home / Sourou history
Nestled in the arid landscapes of West Africa, Sulu—a small but historically significant region in Burkina Faso—has long been a silent witness to the ebb and flow of empires, colonialism, and modern geopolitical struggles. Unlike the more prominent cities of Ouagadougou or Bobo-Dioulasso, Sulu’s history is a tapestry of resilience, adaptation, and quiet defiance.
Before European colonization, Sulu was a vital node in the trans-Saharan trade network. The Mossi Kingdoms, which dominated much of present-day Burkina Faso, regarded Sulu as a strategic outpost for exchanging gold, salt, and textiles with Berber and Arab traders. Oral histories speak of Sulu’s griots (storytellers) preserving tales of caravans that stretched from Timbuktu to the Atlantic coast.
The region’s unique blend of animist traditions and early Islamic influences created a syncretic culture that still echoes in local festivals today. However, this era of relative prosperity was shattered by the arrival of European powers in the late 19th century.
Like much of Africa, Sulu fell victim to the arbitrary borders drawn during the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885. France, eager to expand its West African holdings, incorporated Sulu into Haute-Volta (Upper Volta), a colonial administrative unit. The French imposed forced labor (travail forcé) and cash-crop economies, disrupting Sulu’s self-sustaining agricultural systems.
Resistance was fierce but fragmented. The Lobi and Dagara peoples, known for their decentralized societies, waged guerrilla-style rebellions. Yet, lacking centralized leadership, their efforts were ultimately crushed by French military campaigns.
The colonial era left deep scars. Sulu’s fertile lands were repurposed for cotton and peanut production, fueling European industries while locals faced famine. Infrastructure projects—like the Abidjan-Niger Railway—bypassed Sulu, further marginalizing the region. This economic neglect sowed the seeds for future discontent.
When Burkina Faso gained independence in 1960, Sulu remained an afterthought in national politics—until the rise of Thomas Sankara in the 1980s. Sankara’s revolutionary government prioritized rural development, and Sulu briefly became a testing ground for agrarian reforms. Local cooperatives were established, and women’s literacy programs flourished.
But Sankara’s assassination in 1987 marked a return to the status quo. Subsequent governments, entangled in corruption and external debt, abandoned Sulu once more.
In recent years, Sulu has found itself on the frontlines of the Sahel’s escalating security crisis. Jihadist groups like Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM) have exploited the region’s poverty and weak governance, recruiting disillusioned youth. The Burkinabé military’s heavy-handed response has only deepened the cycle of violence.
Droughts and desertification—exacerbated by climate change—have pushed herders and farmers into conflict over dwindling resources. Sulu’s traditional conflict-resolution mechanisms, once effective, are now overwhelmed.
Faced with state failure, Sulu’s communities have formed Koglweogo militias to protect themselves. While these groups have successfully repelled jihadist attacks, their lack of oversight has led to human rights abuses, complicating the path to stability.
NGOs and UN agencies operate in Sulu, but their impact is often superficial. Food aid arrives sporadically, and education programs fail to address systemic unemployment. Meanwhile, global powers like France and Russia vie for influence, offering military support with strings attached.
With few opportunities, Sulu’s young people are fleeing—either to urban centers or across the Mediterranean. The backway (migration route to Europe) claims lives daily, yet remains a gamble many are willing to take.
Sulu’s story is not unique, but it is emblematic of broader global crises: colonialism’s lingering shadows, climate injustice, and the failure of neoliberal development models. As the world grapples with migration, extremism, and inequality, places like Sulu remind us that local histories are inextricably linked to global upheavals.
The question remains: Will Sulu be remembered only as a casualty of these forces, or can it reclaim its narrative as a beacon of resilience?